Review




Structured Review

Cedarlane er-tr7 ab antibody
Er Tr7 Ab Antibody, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/er-tr7 ab antibody/product/Cedarlane
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
er-tr7 ab antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

94
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti er tr7 alexa fluor 647 ab
( A ) Representative flow cytometric analyses of Ly51 expression and UEA1 binding on TECs for mice; wt ( n = 22), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), Cm_Foxn1 ( n = 11), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). ( B ) Epithelial microenvironment of reconstructed thymi resolved by keratin 5 (K5) (in green) and K8 (in red) staining; 4-week-old mice. m, medulla; c, cortex. Note the small size of the Cm_Foxn4 -reconstructed thymus. ( C ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes relative to wild-type mice; Bl_Foxn4 ( n = 4), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4), and wt ( n = 3). ( D ) Localization of Aire + cells relative to cortical (K8) and medullary (K5) areas. ( E ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes of transgenic relative to wild-type mice; wt ( n = 3), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), and Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4). ( F ) Localization of B220 + B cells (in green) adjacent to <t>ER-TR7</t> + mesenchyme (in red). PVS, perivascular space. ( G ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes of transgenic relative to wild-type mice; wt ( n = 3), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4), Cm_Foxn1 ( n = 3), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). In (C), (E), and (G), each data point represents the average value of at least three mice; all values are significantly different from the wild-type genotype (adjusted P values of <0.05), except those data points falling on “0” Arrows indicate the directions of changes in expression levels between transgenic mice.
Anti Er Tr7 Alexa Fluor 647 Ab, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti er tr7 alexa fluor 647 ab/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti er tr7 alexa fluor 647 ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cedarlane er-tr7 ab antibody
( A ) Representative flow cytometric analyses of Ly51 expression and UEA1 binding on TECs for mice; wt ( n = 22), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), Cm_Foxn1 ( n = 11), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). ( B ) Epithelial microenvironment of reconstructed thymi resolved by keratin 5 (K5) (in green) and K8 (in red) staining; 4-week-old mice. m, medulla; c, cortex. Note the small size of the Cm_Foxn4 -reconstructed thymus. ( C ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes relative to wild-type mice; Bl_Foxn4 ( n = 4), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4), and wt ( n = 3). ( D ) Localization of Aire + cells relative to cortical (K8) and medullary (K5) areas. ( E ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes of transgenic relative to wild-type mice; wt ( n = 3), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), and Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4). ( F ) Localization of B220 + B cells (in green) adjacent to <t>ER-TR7</t> + mesenchyme (in red). PVS, perivascular space. ( G ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes of transgenic relative to wild-type mice; wt ( n = 3), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4), Cm_Foxn1 ( n = 3), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). In (C), (E), and (G), each data point represents the average value of at least three mice; all values are significantly different from the wild-type genotype (adjusted P values of <0.05), except those data points falling on “0” Arrows indicate the directions of changes in expression levels between transgenic mice.
Er Tr7 Ab Antibody, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/er-tr7 ab antibody/product/Cedarlane
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
er-tr7 ab antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Representative flow cytometric analyses of Ly51 expression and UEA1 binding on TECs for mice; wt ( n = 22), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), Cm_Foxn1 ( n = 11), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). ( B ) Epithelial microenvironment of reconstructed thymi resolved by keratin 5 (K5) (in green) and K8 (in red) staining; 4-week-old mice. m, medulla; c, cortex. Note the small size of the Cm_Foxn4 -reconstructed thymus. ( C ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes relative to wild-type mice; Bl_Foxn4 ( n = 4), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4), and wt ( n = 3). ( D ) Localization of Aire + cells relative to cortical (K8) and medullary (K5) areas. ( E ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes of transgenic relative to wild-type mice; wt ( n = 3), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), and Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4). ( F ) Localization of B220 + B cells (in green) adjacent to ER-TR7 + mesenchyme (in red). PVS, perivascular space. ( G ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes of transgenic relative to wild-type mice; wt ( n = 3), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4), Cm_Foxn1 ( n = 3), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). In (C), (E), and (G), each data point represents the average value of at least three mice; all values are significantly different from the wild-type genotype (adjusted P values of <0.05), except those data points falling on “0” Arrows indicate the directions of changes in expression levels between transgenic mice.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Retracing the evolutionary emergence of thymopoiesis

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd9585

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Representative flow cytometric analyses of Ly51 expression and UEA1 binding on TECs for mice; wt ( n = 22), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), Cm_Foxn1 ( n = 11), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). ( B ) Epithelial microenvironment of reconstructed thymi resolved by keratin 5 (K5) (in green) and K8 (in red) staining; 4-week-old mice. m, medulla; c, cortex. Note the small size of the Cm_Foxn4 -reconstructed thymus. ( C ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes relative to wild-type mice; Bl_Foxn4 ( n = 4), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4), and wt ( n = 3). ( D ) Localization of Aire + cells relative to cortical (K8) and medullary (K5) areas. ( E ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes of transgenic relative to wild-type mice; wt ( n = 3), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), and Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4). ( F ) Localization of B220 + B cells (in green) adjacent to ER-TR7 + mesenchyme (in red). PVS, perivascular space. ( G ) Differential gene expression patterns in TEC transcriptomes of transgenic relative to wild-type mice; wt ( n = 3), Cm_Foxn4 ( n = 4), Cm_Foxn1 ( n = 3), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). In (C), (E), and (G), each data point represents the average value of at least three mice; all values are significantly different from the wild-type genotype (adjusted P values of <0.05), except those data points falling on “0” Arrows indicate the directions of changes in expression levels between transgenic mice.

Article Snippet: For ER-TR7 B220 staining, the rat anti–ER-TR7 Alexa Fluor 647 Ab (sc-73355 AF647, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:50 and rat anti-B220 Alexa Fluor 488 Ab (RA3-6B2, eBioscience) at 1:200 were used.

Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Staining, Gene Expression, Transgenic Assay

( A ) Schematic representation of the N-terminal domains of mouse Foxn4, Foxn1, and the Foxn1*4 chimera; boxes correspond to exons, and colored lines correspond to conserved amino acid residues in Foxn4 and Foxn1 clades (see figs. S2 and S8 for details). The > sign denotes the DNA binding and activation domains, which are not shown here. ( B ) Intermediate cellularity of Foxn1*4 thymi (*** P < 0.001; two-tailed t test); wt ( n = 5), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). ( C ) Enlarged CD4 − CD8 − DN compartment in Foxn1*4 thymi ( P < 0.001; two-tailed t test); wt ( n = 5) and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). ( D ) Moderately increased numbers of IgM − CD93 + immature B cells ( P = 0.293; two-tailed t test, compared to wt); wt ( n = 3) and Foxn1*4 ( n = 7). ( E ) Foxn1*4 supports intrathymic T cell development ( P = 0.6654; two-tailed t test, compared to wt); wt ( n = 5) and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). ( F ) Increased B cell development (* P = 0.0335; two-tailed t test, compared to wt); wt ( n = 8), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 7), and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). In (E) and (F), data for Mm_Foxn4 transgenics (shaded area) are taken from . ( G ) Flow cytometric analyses of Ly51 expression and UEA1 binding of EpCAM + CD45 − TECs; wt ( n = 5) and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). ( H ) Epithelial microenvironment of reconstructed thymi resolved by keratin 5 (K5) (in green) and K8 (in red) staining; 4-week-old mice. ( I ) Localization of B220 + B cells (in green) adjacent to ER-TR7 + mesenchyme (in red); inset shows a higher magnification of the indicated region highlighting the perivascular space. ( J and K ) Differential gene expression patterns in TECs; see legend in for details; wt ( n = 3), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), Foxn1*4 ( n = 3), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). In (B), (E), and (F), each data point represents one mouse.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Retracing the evolutionary emergence of thymopoiesis

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd9585

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic representation of the N-terminal domains of mouse Foxn4, Foxn1, and the Foxn1*4 chimera; boxes correspond to exons, and colored lines correspond to conserved amino acid residues in Foxn4 and Foxn1 clades (see figs. S2 and S8 for details). The > sign denotes the DNA binding and activation domains, which are not shown here. ( B ) Intermediate cellularity of Foxn1*4 thymi (*** P < 0.001; two-tailed t test); wt ( n = 5), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). ( C ) Enlarged CD4 − CD8 − DN compartment in Foxn1*4 thymi ( P < 0.001; two-tailed t test); wt ( n = 5) and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). ( D ) Moderately increased numbers of IgM − CD93 + immature B cells ( P = 0.293; two-tailed t test, compared to wt); wt ( n = 3) and Foxn1*4 ( n = 7). ( E ) Foxn1*4 supports intrathymic T cell development ( P = 0.6654; two-tailed t test, compared to wt); wt ( n = 5) and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). ( F ) Increased B cell development (* P = 0.0335; two-tailed t test, compared to wt); wt ( n = 8), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 7), and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). In (E) and (F), data for Mm_Foxn4 transgenics (shaded area) are taken from . ( G ) Flow cytometric analyses of Ly51 expression and UEA1 binding of EpCAM + CD45 − TECs; wt ( n = 5) and Foxn1*4 ( n = 13). ( H ) Epithelial microenvironment of reconstructed thymi resolved by keratin 5 (K5) (in green) and K8 (in red) staining; 4-week-old mice. ( I ) Localization of B220 + B cells (in green) adjacent to ER-TR7 + mesenchyme (in red); inset shows a higher magnification of the indicated region highlighting the perivascular space. ( J and K ) Differential gene expression patterns in TECs; see legend in for details; wt ( n = 3), Mm_Foxn4 ( n = 6), Foxn1*4 ( n = 3), and Cm_dtg ( n = 5). In (B), (E), and (F), each data point represents one mouse.

Article Snippet: For ER-TR7 B220 staining, the rat anti–ER-TR7 Alexa Fluor 647 Ab (sc-73355 AF647, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:50 and rat anti-B220 Alexa Fluor 488 Ab (RA3-6B2, eBioscience) at 1:200 were used.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Activation Assay, Two Tailed Test, Expressing, Staining, Gene Expression